Life is tough. When we think of our lives, we tend to focus on a broad scale: the years, or decades, that we have been on Earth. Yet, our lives are actually lived one short moment at a time. Every moment is a drop of water, that we make a choice with, and over time, alter the course of our lives. For most people, those tiny decisions they make are not based on rules, laws, commandments, or high philosophy, but by evaluating the situation and applying their morals. Throughout a life, morals may change. Life is fluid, our understanding may widen over time like an old river, and slow down to bend and accommodate to the opinions and values of others that we meet in the course of our lives.
Humans are intelligent beings with self-consciousness, and therefore simply living and surviving is not enough; we require a goal in life. All people, whether great philosophers, priests, farmers or prisoners, have their own interpretation of life, its goals, and how to make the most of it all. Through the ages, the philosophies of people are shared, and shaped to fit the times, the society and the individual’s personality. In my life, I have been able to live in a complex time in history in radically different societies, and through these experiences, I have been able to shape my own individual philosophy.
Different philosophers have different ideas of how a person should be moral, and what should be their goal in life. Hobbes said that we all are in the state of nature and we need to be under a social contract, under an absolute monarch system. Mill’s Utilitarian theory defines morality in terms of maximization of utility for all parties affected by a decision or action; summarized by the principle: “The greatest good for greatest number of people.” However, unlike Mill where the act of morality depends on the consequences Kant believes whether or not a person acted morally depends on whether he or she had acted on reason alone. Kant sees will as fully autonomous and therefore he believes it requires no external motivation. MacIntyre proposed that all these Enlightenment thinkers were systematically destroying morality, leaving it in fragments. According to MacIntyre, the theories set forth on the basis of human nature failed because all of them rejected any ability for reason to determine or discover a unitary human end.
Through this extremely brief summary of the philosophical theories presented, we are able to see that many of these philosophical theories have been created with a sense of egoism that time has exposed as slightly limited in their viewpoint. Though these philosophies may have seemed right for the time and culture that they were formed in, they have not stood up to the fluid nature of the ages. Calling on ethical principles of these philosophers doesn’t always lend clarity to solving a problem. For example: one person may argue that the consequences matter most (utilitarianism) while another can refute that by saying that those are chance, and intentions are more important (Kant). Through this over-simplified example, we can see that a single philosophical viewpoint may be too narrow to provide an answer.
Imagine, if upon leaving an ethics class, every student suddenly knew how to figure out all the right answers to ethical problems; if they wanted to know (more…)